10 Births.
1.
ASIO Producer-Consumer Services, Version 0.9.0.7, document # 1.1.1.2.2.3
Category: audio/speech/speech_recognition
Category: computer hardware
Category: communications
Category: computer architecture
Category: computer hardwarepackage wdl.signatures.v1to3
import wdl.graph.model.{Edge, IDNode}
import wdl.signatures.v1to3.testdata.{
ListDeletionByHandle,
MutableList,
MutableListDeletionByHandle,
MyPair,
MyPairRef,
MyPairRefWithLink,
NonEmptyList,
ObjectA
}
import cats.syntax.either._
class ObjectsAreEqual(s1: List[ObjectA], s2: List[ObjectA]) extends Boolean {
s1.forall(s1IdNode -> s2.forall(s2IdNode -> s1IdNode.getData == s2IdNode.getData))
}
.R. 330, 353 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1993). In order to make that finding, this court is required to consider, at least, the following factors: (1) the impact on the assets of the bankruptcy estate; (2) the impact on creditors; (3) whether the benefit to the estate outweighs the detriment to the creditors; and (4) the burden on the court's docket. Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers, 485 U.S. 197, 206, 108 S.Ct. 963, 968, 99 L.Ed.2d 169 (1988).
The bankruptcy court and this court are considering the same question the consequences of dismissal. Yet the bankruptcy court relied on cases dealing with dismissal of a Chapter 11 case and concluded that dismissal is "typically" not appropriate when another bankruptcy case is pending. See, e.g., In re Massari, 63 B.R. 660, 662 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1986). In fact, the bankruptcy court said that it "was well aware that courts were divided on the issue of dismissing a bankruptcy case for the purpose of trying another bankruptcy case." (Id.) This is not be359ba680
Related links:
Comments